The Equalizer 2 Review: Patient, Vicious Fun

✯✯✯✯

The thing that immediately pops about The Equalizer 2 is how measured it is.

The sequel, which brings back Denzel Washington as Robert McCall as well as Antoine Fuqua at the helm and Richard Wenk on script, kicks off with a scene of McCall doing what the first film established he does best: murdering mooks that have done someone incredibly wrong, dispassionately and savagely. In this case, it’s men working for an abusive man who has kidnapped his daughter from his former wife and fled to his native country of Turkey. We don’t see what happens to the abuser, but McCall sits him down and gives him (and by extension us) a clue: “There are two types of pain in this world,” he says, “pain that hurts and pain that alters. Today, you get to choose.” I’m not entirely sure what that means, but it’s cold as shit and it apparently gets the job done; that’s all I need.

mv5bmjewmjmymzi3nv5bml5banbnxkftztgwmtc1ndg3ntm-_v1_

But then the movie slows down. For a shocking amount of time, the film becomes something more character-focused, feeling little pressure to hurry the viewer over to the next set piece. Instead, it wants to show you McCall in his default environment: working as a Lyft driver, nurturing the few bonds he has. They’re not friendships, really; he doesn’t open up to any of these people. But they open up to him, and he respects where they come from and what they fight for. So much of this movie just marinates in that little social network McCall’s caught up in, where his active support of the people surrounding him translates into passive nourishment for his soul, sustaining him, but never quite filling him. McCall’s still going through the hundred books to read before you die on behalf of his late wife—he’s on the last one, in fact, and predictably, he’s not very anxious to start. The one friend he has, CIA bigwig Susan (Melissa Leo), is telling him that maybe it’s time to move back into the old family home on the sea, and he gets it, but he’s still resistant. You could be forgiven for thinking this was an Oscar-bait melodrama at times, if not for the occasional explosions of violence that dot the first half as McCall quietly, expertly extricates these people from intense situations.

To be sure, there’s still a plot; it unfurls in the background in fits and starts, kicking off after a group of men execute a hit on a Belgian CIA asset and his wife. Fuqua chooses to lean into McCall’s routine, only committing his full attention to the big story after Susan is killed while investigating the hit.

mv5bmtk0mzm1njg5nl5bml5banbnxkftztgwnjc1ndg3ntm-_v1_

It’s not accidental; it’s a statement. Fuqua’s drawing a parallel between the humanistic drive of the sociopathically violent McCall and the legitimate sociopathic behaviors of the people he’s up against. Through these parallels, he riffs on ideas both political and personal; the film’s villains, assassins for hire through the private sector, argue that they were forced to become villainous through the machinations of the military industrial complex and that what they do for the highest bidder isn’t much different from what the government told them to do. It’s not hard to see his point, but through Fuqua’s lens, it’s still not a sympathetic one, because he spent the last hour setting up the difference between clear-eyed violence to protect your community and willfully ignorant violence for Your Given Cause.

Of course, “clear-eyed” is the key term here. McCall is neither repulsed by or lustful for the violence he visits on others. He finds it satisfying because of how he came up, allowing the movie a context to luxuriate in all the grisly ways he takes various bastards down. (Just like the first film, the final act of this one plays like a slasher, right down to the violent kills by an emotionless figure.) Yet McCall respects the abnormality of that satisfaction. He respects it enough to try and steer Miles (Ashton Sanders), a kid he falls into mentoring, away from that violence. Later, when one of the bad guys asks McCall if he (as in McCall himself) deserves death for what he did in the past, McCall says “A thousand times over” without hesitation. It’s essentially the old “We’re not so different” chestnut, answered with a markedly refreshing “No, we’re not. And?”

mv5boty2mduzndy5ml5bml5banbnxkftztgwnzc1ndg3ntm-_v1_

McCall is essentially ronin. He’s a man of extraordinary violence who, in the absence of a master, has chosen to give himself over to a nonspiritual yet deeply moralistic lifestyle. Because he has no higher calling, he doesn’t let himself care about the couple murdered at the beginning of the film; if it was a hit, it was ordered by someone, but the film has no interest in who it was. The crimes of the film’s villains amount strictly to murdering Susan because the ways they mirror McCall are part of the movie’s point. McCall puts it into words near the end of the second act: Their tragedy, so to speak, isn’t that they’re being punished for being evil; the world isn’t perfect, therefore it doesn’t work like that. Their tragedy is that they were supposed to operate with impunity, and by a freak coincidence ran into the one man who wouldn’t let them. Action movies are full of narratives like this (for starters, Die Hard) but the film makes sure to spell it out here because it’s key to understanding what it’s saying about its hero: He’s supposed to be the villain. He’s a tool of the powerful, whose personal pain has indirectly led him to work for the powerless. He can’t correct all the injustice of the world, nor will he try. But he can fight for the loose network that unwittingly supports him. And in chronicling how he does so, the film takes a stand in favor of community and empathy in a way that few action films ever do.

I have issues, to be sure. I wish the film could have made its point without wasting talents like Melissa Leo and Bill Pullman, and as effective as some of the character-based scenes are, I wish they weren’t borne from such hackneyed concepts. As curious as it can be, The Equalizer 2 is ultimately still junk cinema, and for those who like their action consistent, smooth, and inventive ala John Wick, it won’t go down that easy. But the patient will be rewarded with a clever character study that pairs surprisingly well with the righteous murder on display.


Watch the trailer here:

All images courtesy of Sony Pictures.


Directed by Antoine Fuqua
Screenplay by Richard Wenk
Based on the TV series created by Michael Sloan & Richard Lindheim
Produced by Todd Black, Jason Blumenthal, Denzel Washington, Alex Siskin, Steve Tisch, Antoine Fuqua, Mace Neufeld, Tony Eldridge, Michael Sloan
Starring Denzel Washington, Pedro Pascal, Ashton Sanders, Bill Pullman, Melissa Leo
Release Year: 2018
Running Time: 121 minutes

Roman J. Israel, Esq. – Review

✯✯½

Dan Gilroy’s follow-up to Nightcrawler is a film that seems to exist, but you only ask yourself what would have happened to the same skill you will have recognized prior because in the case of Roman J. Israel, Esq., it all seems to have gone away. It all seems to have gone away because compared to the cleverness and the overall visceral nature of that past effort, it seems to have gone away in the favour of what I would only assume is Denzel Washington speaking in the veins of an imitator of Aaron Sorkin. Granted, it may be entertaining to see Denzel Washington just merely being Denzel Washington like we always have seen him as, but at its worst, Roman J. Israel, Esq. is just absolutely boring.

Continue reading →

General Thoughts: The 90th Academy Awards

One knows already how predictable the Academy Awards can become after the route of the Golden Globes and the SAG Awards among many more, but in the 90 years that we have seen them moving onward, what they had managed to turn forth was not only one of the strongest lineups in a while but also one of the most pleasantly surprising, knowing where their own habits lie. If there was anything else to be said about what the Academy Awards have in store for us this year, then it only makes this year’s ceremony – unlike the past few at least, worth looking forward to.

Bold indicates my vote for said category.
Underline indicates who I think will win.

To read more about the picks this year in the major categories, click “read more.” Continue reading →

Philadelphia – Review

✯✯✯½

On some count it’s easy for me to say that Philadelphia isn’t really Jonathan Demme at the very best of his own ability because it feels like such a drastic change of pace to follow up from the comedies he was known for and the Oscar-winning The Silence of the Lambs. But in the late filmmaker’s memory, I have to admit that there’s another level where I’ve always found myself respecting Philadelphia by a good lot. Being one of the first mainstream Hollywood films to bring attention to AIDS and homophobia and its impact on society, considering how far we’ve come today it’s still interesting to look at how the world’s perspective has changed at least two decades later. Even if this is a lesser entry in the filmography of a director like Jonathan Demme, there’s still a special sort of recognition I believe Philadephia deserves for what it had done back on the day of its release.

Continue reading →

Malcolm X – Review

✯✯✯✯✯

The closest that Spike Lee has ever gotten to touching what he managed to leave behind in Do the Right Thing was his own presentation in Malcolm X, a biopic about the famous Afro-American activist. I still remember when I first watched Malcolm X quite vividly, I was only reading about him during one of my history classes and in order to prepare for an essay, I turned on Spike Lee’s feature about the man, for I didn’t see only what I would have thought I could learn about Malcolm X only from reading a textbook. By the time I came out, I still found it hard enough even attempting to finish the essay although it seemed I knew what Malcolm X was like and I got a greater understanding of how he succeeded. He was not a man without his controversies but it’s amazing to see what Spike Lee made of his own life story in here: arguably one of the most important American films of its time, and still a subject worth noting in the present.

Continue reading →

The Magnificent Seven (2016) – Review

✯✯✯

Antoine Fuqua remakes another remake with The Magnificent Seven, his latest offering thus far. Being a remake of a remake, there’s always room to turn something into one’s own vision and that’s part of what I was hoping for in this new take on the story inspired from Akira Kurosawa’s Seven Samurai, but something about it also feels empty. What happened to the excitement of watching a group of seven fight for good? Sure, there’s fun to be had within certain moments of the film but perhaps they only work because of how the film presents itself out to be as a result of those involved rather than offering much to stand on its own. Quite surprisingly, that is actually not what bothered me most about this re-imagining of the classic tale. Continue reading →